Designing studies that survive scrutiny: pre-registration in industry research
Why fixing hypotheses and analysis plans before data collection protects both credibility and budget.
Read moreCritical Research Institute designs and runs rigorous studies in health, environment, technology, society, and industry — and delivers findings you can defend and act on.
One institute, many disciplines. Each area is led by researchers with domain expertise and shared standards for design, data, and reporting.
Clinical and observational studies, epidemiology, health outcomes, and real-world evidence.
ExploreWater, soil, air, and ecosystem monitoring; climate risk; remediation effectiveness.
ExploreAlgorithm evaluation, AI safety and bias audits, software reliability, and cybersecurity assessment.
ExploreSurveys, experiments, program evaluation, and qualitative research on how people decide and act.
ExploreProduct testing, failure analysis, durability, and standards conformance.
ExploreGrid, transport, and built-environment studies; performance and resilience assessment.
ExploreEnd-to-end support from the first question to the final report — or any single stage you need.
Hypotheses, sampling frames, power calculations, endpoints, and pre-registration. We design studies that can answer the question before any data is collected.
Site management, participant recruitment, sensor deployment, surveys, and interviews — run to a written protocol with documented chain of custody.
Analytical chemistry, microbiology, materials testing, and environmental sampling through our partner laboratory network.
Validated databases, statistical analysis plans, modeling, machine learning, and reproducible analysis pipelines.
IRB/ethics submissions, GCP and GLP alignment, quality assurance audits, and documentation for regulators and standards bodies.
Literature reviews, meta-analysis, and evidence maps that show what is known, what is contested, and what is missing.
Independent assessment of programs, products, and policies — with findings written for the people who have to decide.
Technical reports, peer-reviewed manuscripts, regulatory dossiers, and briefings for boards and public audiences.
Every study follows a written protocol, a pre-specified analysis plan, and a documented audit trail. Our findings are the same whether the client likes them or not — which is why clients keep coming back with harder questions.
Organizations that need evidence they can stand behind.
Program evaluation, environmental monitoring, public-health surveillance, and policy analysis delivered to procurement and audit standards.
Product testing, market and pricing research, safety studies, and third-party validation buyers and regulators trust.
Clinical and observational studies, health economics, outcomes research, and real-world evidence.
Impact measurement, needs assessments, and independent evaluation of funded programs.
Methods, findings, and perspective from our research teams.
Why fixing hypotheses and analysis plans before data collection protects both credibility and budget.
Read moreChain-of-custody, calibration, and replication practices for environmental and infrastructure programs.
Read moreWhat clinical evidence standards can teach technology buyers about validation, monitoring, and post-market surveillance.
Read moreTell us what you need to know. We respond within two business days with a scoped approach.